On Tuesday, the NBA announced that James Harden has been fined $100,000 for his public comments about his trade request from the Philadelphia 76ers. The NBA’s investigation confirmed that Harden believed the 76ers would not fulfill his request. The National Basketball Players Association (NBPA) has expressed disagreement with the ruling and plans to challenge it. The NBPA believes that Harden’s comments do not violate the rule against public trade demands.
Harden had made these comments on August 14 at an event in China, where he stated that he would not be part of an organization if Daryl Morey, the 76ers’ executive, was involved. Harden’s comments gained attention because they suggested that he would only play for the 76ers if Morey was not part of the organization. The NBA interpreted this as a refusal to fulfill his contractual obligations with the team. It is worth noting that Harden had willingly opted into his player option for the 2023-24 season with the 76ers.
The NBPA argues that making trade demands publicly should not be against the rules and will file a grievance to challenge the league’s decision. They believe that players should have the right to express their preferences regarding trades, citing examples of other players who have expressed their desire to be traded privately.
The NBA’s investigation focused on whether Harden’s comments about Morey potentially referred to a previous understanding between the two. However, the investigation found that Harden’s comments specifically referred to Morey telling him he would be traded after opting into his contract for the 2023-24 season.
The situation highlights the ongoing debate around player empowerment in the NBA and the balance between player desires and contractual obligations. It remains to be seen how the NBPA’s challenge will be resolved and what impact it may have on future trade request situations.